// Comparison
À la trace vs La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ?: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on Surveillance, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
An investigative map of modern surveillance — from data brokers and facial recognition to contact-tracing — charting how continuous digital tracking became normal, by a French tech journalist.
A provocative, well-reported take on privacy in the digital age — answering the cliché that 'young people don't care about privacy' — by an investigative journalist specialised in surveillance.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- A 2020 investigative cartography of the new surveillance — data brokers, facial recognition, tracing.
- Tesquet reports with specifics, making the abstract surveillance economy concrete.
- Read for the landscape and the cases; pair with Nitot/Untersinger for what to do about it.
- A sharp French essay dismantling the 'nothing to hide / young people don't care' clichés about privacy.
- Manach is a specialist surveillance journalist, so the reporting is grounded.
- Read it for the argument and framing; as a 2010 essay, treat the specific services as dated.
How they compare
We rate À la trace higher (4/5 against 3/5 for La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ?). For most readers, that means À la trace is the primary pick and La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ? is a useful follow-up.
Both books target beginner-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
À la trace and La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ? both cover Surveillance, Privacy, Policy, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.
Keep reading
La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ?
→ Alternatives to La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ?→ What to read after La vie privée, un problème de vieux cons ?