// Comparison
@War vs Cult of the Dead Cow: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on History, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
Shane Harris on the entanglement of US military doctrine, the intelligence community, and private contractors after cyberspace was declared the fifth warfighting domain.
How the Original Hacking Supergroup Might Just Save the World
Joseph Menn
Joseph Menn's history of cDc — the Texas-rooted hacking collective that coined 'hacktivism', shipped Back Orifice, and threaded its way through three decades of the security industry's coming-of-age.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- The Military-Internet Complex is real, profitable, and largely opaque to oversight; Harris names the contractors and traces the dollar flows.
- CYBERCOM's establishment was less doctrine than Pentagon turf consolidation; the book documents the bureaucratic battles candidly.
- Defense and offense are organisationally entangled inside the US government; the conflicts of interest the book describes have only sharpened since publication.
- The hacker-to-defender arc that the security industry now runs on was largely socialized inside groups like cDc in the 1990s.
- The book's policy thread — that disclosure and ethics were debates, not assumptions — is its most underrated half.
- Several still-active companies and government roles trace directly to people who first met on cDc message boards; the genealogy chart is the book's quiet thesis.
How they compare
@War and Cult of the Dead Cow are both rated 4/5 in our catalog. Pick by topic preference and reading style rather than by rating.
Both books target beginner-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
@War and Cult of the Dead Cow both cover History, Narrative, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.