// Comparison
Attacking Network Protocols vs Evading EDR: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on Offensive, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
A Hacker's Guide to Capture, Analysis, and Exploitation
James Forshaw
James Forshaw, Project Zero veteran, on how to capture, parse, and break protocols from the wire up to the application layer, with a strong focus on building reusable analysis tooling.
A component-by-component teardown of how modern EDR sensors actually collect telemetry, and where each data source can be starved, blinded, or bypassed.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- Capturing, parsing, and replaying traffic is one workflow, not three, and Forshaw's tooling-first framing makes that explicit.
- Custom-protocol auditing (the part security curricula skip) is the part of the book that pays back hardest, especially for embedded, OT, and proprietary stacks.
- The "build your own network analysis tool" chapters teach more about how protocols actually work than any number of Wireshark lessons.
- EDR is a collection of telemetry sources, not a monolith; evasion means knowing which source sees what.
- Most durable bypasses attack the sensor's data collection, not its detection logic.
- Vendor-agnostic understanding outlives any specific bypass, which vendors patch fast.
How they compare
We rate Attacking Network Protocols higher (5/5 against 4/5 for Evading EDR). For most readers, that means Attacking Network Protocols is the primary pick and Evading EDR is a useful follow-up.
Both books target advanced-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Attacking Network Protocols and Evading EDR both cover Offensive, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.