// Comparison
Black Hat Python vs Hacking: The Art of Exploitation: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on Offensive, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
Python Programming for Hackers and Pentesters
Justin Seitz, Tim Arnold
Justin Seitz and Tim Arnold's hands-on tour of writing offensive tooling in Python: network sniffers, web scrapers, GitHub-based command-and-control, screen capture, keylogging, and Volatility extensions.
A from-first-principles tour of low-level exploitation that still teaches the mindset two decades later.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- Most operational tools you use can be replaced by ~50 lines of Python that do exactly what you need; the book is a series of working examples of that thesis.
- The networking, web-scraping and process-injection chapters individually pay back the cost of the book once you've used the patterns three times.
- The 2nd edition (Python 3, modern libraries) is the one to buy; the first edition's Python 2 code is dated.
- Exploitation is a way of seeing programs, not a list of techniques.
- Memory corruption is best learned with a debugger open beside the book.
- The first half on C/assembly is worth the price even if you skip the exploits.
How they compare
We rate Hacking: The Art of Exploitation higher (5/5 against 4/5 for Black Hat Python). For most readers, that means Hacking: The Art of Exploitation is the primary pick and Black Hat Python is a useful follow-up.
Both books target intermediate-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Black Hat Python and Hacking: The Art of Exploitation both cover Offensive, Networking, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.
Keep reading
Hacking: The Art of Exploitation
→ Alternatives to Hacking: The Art of Exploitation→ What to read after Hacking: The Art of Exploitation