// Comparison

Cybercriminalité vs Social Engineering: Which Should You Read?

Two cybersecurity books on Foundations, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.

Intermediate
3/52023
Cybercriminalité

Comprendre, prévenir, réagir

Solange Ghernaouti

Solange Ghernaouti's structured treatment of cybercrime — how it works, how to prevent it, how to respond — spanning technical, legal and organisational angles.

Intermediate
4/52018
Social Engineering

The Science of Human Hacking

Christopher Hadnagy

Christopher Hadnagy's broad procedural reference on social engineering as a discipline — recon, pretexting, elicitation, microexpressions, and the structured engagement model his consultancy operationalized.

Read this if

Students (law, management, engineering), managers and investigators who want a structured, up-to-date overview of cybercrime across technical, legal and human dimensions.
Working SE practitioners, awareness-program leads, and people building structured social-engineering engagements who want a single reference for the discipline. Stronger on framework and process than Mitnick; the elicitation and influence chapters draw heavily on Cialdini and Ekman.

Skip this if

Practitioners wanting forensic or offensive technique; like Ghernaouti's other work, it's a structured survey, not a hands-on manual.
Readers wanting Mitnick-style war stories or modern AI-driven SE tradecraft (deepfake voice clones, LLM-assisted spearphish). Hadnagy's controversial separation from DEF CON in 2022 is also worth being aware of as context for the author rather than the book.

Key takeaways

  • A 2023 structured survey of cybercrime spanning technique, law and prevention — broad rather than deep.
  • Strong on the legal and organisational response that purely technical books skip.
  • A natural companion to Ghernaouti's Cybersécurité, focused on the criminal dimension.
  • SE is a structured engagement, not a stunt; the book operationalizes the kill chain in a way most practitioners can adapt directly.
  • Microexpression and influence material is borrowed but well-applied; the chapters on elicitation are the book's most cited.
  • The framework (information gathering → pretext → influence → exit) is the book's lasting contribution and the implicit syllabus for most modern SE training.

How they compare

We rate Social Engineering higher (4/5 against 3/5 for Cybercriminalité). For most readers, that means Social Engineering is the primary pick and Cybercriminalité is a useful follow-up.

Both books target intermediate-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.

Cybercriminalité and Social Engineering both cover Foundations, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.

Keep reading

Related topics