// Comparison
Cybercriminalité vs Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on Policy, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
A practitioner's treatment of cybercrime law — offences, procedure, and the application of criminal law to digital crime — by a French magistrate specialised in the field.
From Planning to Execution
Robert Lelewski, John Hollenberger
Two veteran security consultants walk through planning, running, and following up on tabletop exercises, from technical incident-response drills to executive-level and cross-functional scenarios.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- A specialist legal reference on French cybercrime law, by a magistrate who works the field.
- Covers the offences, procedure and application of criminal law to digital crime.
- Law evolves: read for the framework and reasoning, but verify specifics against current legislation.
- Splits cleanly into process (how to plan, facilitate, and evaluate an exercise) and content (ready-made scenarios across technical, executive, and cross-functional levels).
- Facilitation technique gets real attention — keeping participants engaged is treated as a skill, not an afterthought.
- Evaluation and follow-up are covered as seriously as the exercise itself, closing the loop that many tabletop efforts skip.
How they compare
We rate Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises higher (4/5 against 3/5 for Cybercriminalité). For most readers, that means Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises is the primary pick and Cybercriminalité is a useful follow-up.
Both books target intermediate-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Cybercriminalité and Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises both cover Policy, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.
Keep reading
Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises
→ Alternatives to Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises→ What to read after Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercises