// Comparison

Cyberstratégie vs The Hacker and the State: Which Should You Read?

Two cybersecurity books on Geopolitics, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.

Intermediate

3/52012

Cyberstratégie

L'art de la guerre numérique

Bertrand Boyer

An early French military-strategic treatment of cyberspace as a theatre of operations — doctrine, deterrence and the determinants of a national cyber policy — by a French officer and strategist.

Beginner

5/52020

The Hacker and the State

Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics

Ben Buchanan

Ben Buchanan's argument that state-on-state cyber operations are not deterrence-shaped (like nuclear) but signaling-shaped: countries use cyber to shape the environment, not to threaten escalation. Builds the case from declassified incidents.

Read this if

Readers interested in the strategic and military dimension of cyber: doctrine, statecraft, deterrence, and how cyberspace fits into conflict. Strong on the French/European strategic perspective often missing from US-centric accounts.

Anyone trying to think clearly about state-sponsored cyber: policy staff, threat-intel analysts, journalists, and security leaders who have to brief on "the cyber threat" without resorting to vendor decks. The single best academic-grade synthesis of the last twenty years of state cyber operations.

Skip this if

Technically-minded readers wanting attacks or defence; this is strategy and doctrine, not tooling. As a 2012 book, some examples predate the last decade of cyber-conflict.

Readers wanting forensic detail on specific operations. Buchanan synthesizes; for the procedural blow-by-blow on Stuxnet, NotPetya, or the SolarWinds incident, go to Zetter, Greenberg, and the post-incident reports respectively.

Key takeaways

A foundational French-language text on cyber as a domain of warfare and statecraft, not as a technical discipline.
Brings a French/European strategic lens to a conversation usually dominated by American voices.
From 2012, so read it for doctrine and framing rather than current events — pair with newer reporting for the post-2014 era.

Cyber is poorly modeled by deterrence theory: states use it constantly, below the threshold of war, to shape the environment rather than to threaten escalation.
The signaling/shaping distinction (espionage, sabotage, destabilization, election interference) is the right taxonomy for analyzing modern campaigns and is the book's most reused contribution.
Attribution and accountability remain genuinely hard, and that asymmetry is itself a structural feature of cyber statecraft, not a temporary condition awaiting better tools.

How they compare

We rate The Hacker and the State higher (5/5 against 3/5 for Cyberstratégie). For most readers, that means The Hacker and the State is the primary pick and Cyberstratégie is a useful follow-up.

Cyberstratégie is pitched at intermediate level. The Hacker and the State is pitched at beginner level. Read the easier one first if you're not yet comfortable with the topic.

Cyberstratégie and The Hacker and the State both cover Geopolitics, Strategy, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.

Keep reading