// Comparison
Hacking: The Art of Exploitation vs Pentesting Azure Applications: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on Offensive, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
A from-first-principles tour of low-level exploitation that still teaches the mindset two decades later.
The Definitive Guide to Testing and Securing Deployments
Matt Burrough
Matt Burrough on attacker behaviour against Azure tenants: identity, storage, VMs, key material handling, and the recon paths that work against real subscriptions.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- Exploitation is a way of seeing programs, not a list of techniques.
- Memory corruption is best learned with a debugger open beside the book.
- The first half on C/assembly is worth the price even if you skip the exploits.
- Azure attack patterns center on identity and roles, not network-level vulnerabilities; the book's framing reflects that.
- Storage account misconfigurations remain one of the most common Azure findings; the book's coverage of access-key abuse is still relevant.
- Cloud pentest reporting differs meaningfully from network pentest reporting; the book's deliverable templates are useful starting points.
How they compare
We rate Hacking: The Art of Exploitation higher (5/5 against 3/5 for Pentesting Azure Applications). For most readers, that means Hacking: The Art of Exploitation is the primary pick and Pentesting Azure Applications is a useful follow-up.
Both books target intermediate-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Hacking: The Art of Exploitation and Pentesting Azure Applications both cover Offensive, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.
Keep reading
Hacking: The Art of Exploitation
→ Alternatives to Hacking: The Art of Exploitation→ What to read after Hacking: The Art of ExploitationPentesting Azure Applications
→ Alternatives to Pentesting Azure Applications→ What to read after Pentesting Azure Applications