// Comparison
Hacking vs Pentesting Azure Applications: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on Offensive, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
Un labo virtuel pour auditer et mettre en place des contre-mesures
Franck Ebel, Jérôme Hennecart
A hands-on French guide to building a virtual lab (Proxmox) and using it to audit application, web and system flaws — then implement countermeasures.
The Definitive Guide to Testing and Securing Deployments
Matt Burrough
Matt Burrough on attacker behaviour against Azure tenants: identity, storage, VMs, key material handling, and the recon paths that work against real subscriptions.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- A practical French guide to building your own vulnerability lab and auditing it end to end.
- Covers application, web and system flaws with the matching countermeasures — attack and defence together.
- From 2013: the method holds, but expect to modernise the specific tools and lab stack.
- Azure attack patterns center on identity and roles, not network-level vulnerabilities; the book's framing reflects that.
- Storage account misconfigurations remain one of the most common Azure findings; the book's coverage of access-key abuse is still relevant.
- Cloud pentest reporting differs meaningfully from network pentest reporting; the book's deliverable templates are useful starting points.
How they compare
Hacking and Pentesting Azure Applications are both rated 3/5 in our catalog. Pick by topic preference and reading style rather than by rating.
Both books target intermediate-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Hacking and Pentesting Azure Applications both cover Offensive, Pentesting, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.