// Comparison

Incident Response and Computer Forensics vs The Art of Memory Forensics: Which Should You Read?

Two cybersecurity books on Incident Response, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.

Intermediate

4/52014

Incident Response and Computer Forensics

Jason T. Luttgens, Matthew Pepe, Kevin Mandia

Luttgens, Pepe, and Mandia's working playbook for running an enterprise IR engagement: pre-engagement readiness, evidence acquisition, network and host forensics, and the project-management discipline that separates a controlled response from a panic.

Advanced

5/52014

The Art of Memory Forensics

Detecting Malware and Threats in Windows, Linux, and Mac Memory

Michael Hale Ligh, Andrew Case, Jamie Levy, AAron Walters

Ligh, Case, Levy, and Walters' canonical reference on memory analysis with Volatility — the technique, the tooling, and the operating-system internals it depends on, across Windows, Linux, and macOS.

Read this if

Junior-to-senior incident responders, SOC leads, and CISOs who need the canonical cross-discipline reference for what a real IR program looks like end to end. Strongest as a structural primer — the maturity model implicit in the book is still the field's de facto baseline.

Incident responders, threat hunters, and malware analysts moving past disk forensics into the place where modern attackers actually live: in memory, in transit, and unbacked by files on disk. Also the textbook for the GCFA-and-beyond DFIR career path.

Skip this if

Readers wanting current tradecraft on identity-attack response (AAD, OAuth abuse, golden SAML), cloud-IR specifically, or modern EDR-driven hunting; the book is largely on-prem 2014. Pair with cloud-IR-specific resources (Mandiant blog, AWS / Azure incident-response runbooks) for the missing layer.

Beginners with no OS-internals background; the book assumes you know what a process, a handle, and a kernel object are. Also dated on Volatility 3 — written for 2.x — though the conceptual material translates cleanly.

Key takeaways

Readiness is the engagement: most of what determines the outcome of an IR is decided before the call comes in.
The acquire-then-analyze discipline still holds; cutting that corner is what produces the bad-headline retrospectives.
The book's project-management chapters are the underrated half — most failed responses are management failures, not technical ones.

Memory is the only place where modern post-exploitation tools are guaranteed to be honest; the book makes that argument by showing what you can recover that disk cannot.
Volatility plugins are an investigative grammar — once you know the verbs, you can construct the questions; the book is the dictionary for the grammar.
Cross-OS memory forensics is one workflow with three dialects; the unified Windows/Linux/macOS coverage is the book's underrated structural choice.

How they compare

We rate The Art of Memory Forensics higher (5/5 against 4/5 for Incident Response and Computer Forensics). For most readers, that means The Art of Memory Forensics is the primary pick and Incident Response and Computer Forensics is a useful follow-up.

Incident Response and Computer Forensics is pitched at intermediate level. The Art of Memory Forensics is pitched at advanced level. Read the easier one first if you're not yet comfortable with the topic.

Incident Response and Computer Forensics and The Art of Memory Forensics both cover Incident Response, Forensics, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.

Keep reading