// Comparison

Penetration Testing vs Pentesting Azure Applications: Which Should You Read?

Two cybersecurity books on Pentesting, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.

Beginner
4/52014
Penetration Testing

A Hands-On Introduction to Hacking

Georgia Weidman

Georgia Weidman's lab-driven introduction to pentesting, walking the reader from setting up a target environment through scanning, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting.

Intermediate
3/52018
Pentesting Azure Applications

The Definitive Guide to Testing and Securing Deployments

Matt Burrough

Matt Burrough on attacker behaviour against Azure tenants: identity, storage, VMs, key material handling, and the recon paths that work against real subscriptions.

Read this if

Beginners who want a single hands-on intro that walks them through a complete pentest workflow: lab setup, recon, exploitation, post-exploitation, reporting. Still the friendliest entry point in print.
Cloud pentesters whose scope includes Azure subscriptions. Burrough covers identity (Entra ID), storage account abuse, VM-level recon, key material handling, and the role-based access patterns that drive real Azure post-exploitation.

Skip this if

Readers who already work in offensive security or want current-decade tooling specifics. The edition is dated against modern Active Directory tradecraft and EDR realities; the workflow is timeless, the tools are not.
Readers focused on AWS or GCP, or anyone wanting current Azure tradecraft. The book pre-dates the current AAD-now-Entra-ID rebrand and several major service updates; treat it as foundational, not current.

Key takeaways

  • A complete pentest is a small number of repeated motions (recon, find foothold, escalate, pivot, document); Weidman teaches the rhythm before the tooling.
  • Lab setup is half the learning; running through the book's Metasploitable-and-Windows-VM lab is what builds the muscle memory the OSCP later assumes.
  • Reporting matters as much as exploitation; the book is one of the few intro texts that takes the deliverable seriously.
  • Azure attack patterns center on identity and roles, not network-level vulnerabilities; the book's framing reflects that.
  • Storage account misconfigurations remain one of the most common Azure findings; the book's coverage of access-key abuse is still relevant.
  • Cloud pentest reporting differs meaningfully from network pentest reporting; the book's deliverable templates are useful starting points.

How they compare

We rate Penetration Testing higher (4/5 against 3/5 for Pentesting Azure Applications). For most readers, that means Penetration Testing is the primary pick and Pentesting Azure Applications is a useful follow-up.

Penetration Testing is pitched at beginner level. Pentesting Azure Applications is pitched at intermediate level. Read the easier one first if you're not yet comfortable with the topic.

Penetration Testing and Pentesting Azure Applications both cover Pentesting, Offensive, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.

Keep reading

Related topics