// Comparison

Penetration Testing vs The Hacker Playbook 3: Which Should You Read?

Two cybersecurity books on Pentesting, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.

Beginner
4/52014
Penetration Testing

A Hands-On Introduction to Hacking

Georgia Weidman

Georgia Weidman's lab-driven introduction to pentesting, walking the reader from setting up a target environment through scanning, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting.

Intermediate
4/52018
The Hacker Playbook 3

Practical Guide to Penetration Testing — Red Team Edition

Peter Kim

Peter Kim's hands-on red-team field manual: assumed-breach scenarios, lateral movement, AV/EDR evasion, and the operational rhythm of a real engagement rather than a checklist of CVEs.

Read this if

Beginners who want a single hands-on intro that walks them through a complete pentest workflow: lab setup, recon, exploitation, post-exploitation, reporting. Still the friendliest entry point in print.
Junior-to-mid red teamers and pentesters moving past CTFs into corporate engagements who want a coherent narrative of how an op flows. The strongest part is the assumed-breach mindset — the assumption that you start from a foothold and have to make it count.

Skip this if

Readers who already work in offensive security or want current-decade tooling specifics. The edition is dated against modern Active Directory tradecraft and EDR realities; the workflow is timeless, the tools are not.
Readers expecting 2024-current tradecraft. Cobalt Strike, Sliver, EDR-bypass research, and modern identity attacks (AAD, conditional access, OAuth abuse) have all moved on since 2018. Treat the techniques as concepts, not commands.

Key takeaways

  • A complete pentest is a small number of repeated motions (recon, find foothold, escalate, pivot, document); Weidman teaches the rhythm before the tooling.
  • Lab setup is half the learning; running through the book's Metasploitable-and-Windows-VM lab is what builds the muscle memory the OSCP later assumes.
  • Reporting matters as much as exploitation; the book is one of the few intro texts that takes the deliverable seriously.
  • Assumed breach is the right starting frame for almost any modern engagement; perimeter-to-DA scenarios are increasingly fiction.
  • The book's value is the workflow — recon, foothold, escalate, persist, exfil — not the specific tools used to demonstrate it.
  • Pair every chapter with a current blog source; the toolchain rotates faster than print can track.

How they compare

Penetration Testing and The Hacker Playbook 3 are both rated 4/5 in our catalog. Pick by topic preference and reading style rather than by rating.

Penetration Testing is pitched at beginner level. The Hacker Playbook 3 is pitched at intermediate level. Read the easier one first if you're not yet comfortable with the topic.

Penetration Testing and The Hacker Playbook 3 both cover Pentesting, Offensive, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.

Keep reading

Related topics