// Comparison
Cult of the Dead Cow vs Kingpin: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on History, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
How the Original Hacking Supergroup Might Just Save the World
Joseph Menn
Joseph Menn's history of cDc — the Texas-rooted hacking collective that coined 'hacktivism', shipped Back Orifice, and threaded its way through three decades of the security industry's coming-of-age.
How One Hacker Took Over the Billion-Dollar Cybercrime Underground
Kevin Poulsen
Kevin Poulsen's reconstruction of Max Butler's career — from white-hat consultant to running CardersMarket, the carding forum that consolidated the early-2000s underground — and the FBI investigation that finally took him down.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- The hacker-to-defender arc that the security industry now runs on was largely socialized inside groups like cDc in the 1990s.
- The book's policy thread — that disclosure and ethics were debates, not assumptions — is its most underrated half.
- Several still-active companies and government roles trace directly to people who first met on cDc message boards; the genealogy chart is the book's quiet thesis.
- Cybercrime markets are markets — they have liquidity, reputation, dispute resolution, and trust topology, and they fail in market-like ways.
- Most underground takedowns are won by HUMINT and OSINT inside the forums, not by exploitation; Butler's downfall was social.
- The book's pacing makes the carding economy legible without flattening the moral complexity of its inhabitants.
How they compare
We rate Kingpin higher (5/5 against 4/5 for Cult of the Dead Cow). For most readers, that means Kingpin is the primary pick and Cult of the Dead Cow is a useful follow-up.
Both books target beginner-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Cult of the Dead Cow and Kingpin both cover History, Narrative, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.