// Comparison
Codebreaking vs Kingpin: Which Should You Read?
Two cybersecurity books on History, compared honestly: who each is for, what each does best, and which to read first.
Elonka Dunin and Klaus Schmeh teach classical cryptanalysis through real, unsolved ciphers, from 19th-century newspaper personal ads to wartime telegrams, using free tools like CrypTool 2.
How One Hacker Took Over the Billion-Dollar Cybercrime Underground
Kevin Poulsen
Kevin Poulsen's reconstruction of Max Butler's career — from white-hat consultant to running CardersMarket, the carding forum that consolidated the early-2000s underground — and the FBI investigation that finally took him down.
Read this if
Skip this if
Key takeaways
- Teaches cryptanalysis on real, unsolved historical ciphers rather than textbook exercises, which keeps the puzzle-solving stakes genuine.
- CrypTool 2 and other free software get hands-on coverage, so the skills transfer to actually attacking a ciphertext, not just reading about it.
- Several of the book's case studies remain unsolved mysteries today; readers are explicitly invited to take a crack at them.
- Cybercrime markets are markets — they have liquidity, reputation, dispute resolution, and trust topology, and they fail in market-like ways.
- Most underground takedowns are won by HUMINT and OSINT inside the forums, not by exploitation; Butler's downfall was social.
- The book's pacing makes the carding economy legible without flattening the moral complexity of its inhabitants.
How they compare
We rate Kingpin higher (5/5 against 4/5 for Codebreaking). For most readers, that means Kingpin is the primary pick and Codebreaking is a useful follow-up.
Both books target beginner-level readers, so the choice is about topic, not difficulty.
Codebreaking and Kingpin both cover History, so reading them in sequence reinforces the same material from different angles.